The directions for Assignment 1B were to analyze the given Reflective Practice Rubric by unpacking the learning expectations by addressing specific questions. Unpacking the rubrics was to be used to assess our learning by clarifying the criteria and specific skills we are expected to acquire in all courses throughout the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It will allow us to self-assess during the learning process. The criteria for our success found in the assignment level descriptors (highly developed, developed, emerging, and initial) define in this assignment the expectations of achievement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This activity had us analyze the differences in criteria between levels. We were reminded to use the academic language of the rubric when responding to the analysis prompt to ensure that all elements in the criteria were addressed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Highly developed: Provides convincing evidence that demonstrates depth, and knowledge of content and explains connections made to real-world situations. Goes beyond expectations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Developed: Provides evidence that demonstrates an understanding of the content that meets the criteria but lacks the depth of knowledge and makes general connections without explanations. All components required are met.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Emerging: Provides partial evidence that demonstrates the required depth in all criteria of the assignment. The response may be unsupported, flawed, or missing elements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Initial: Lacking the evidence required in all criteria of the assignment. The evidence presented may be minimal, unsupported, inadequate, or missing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Highly Developed: <\/strong>Response is highly developed<\/strong> and demonstrates an in-depth<\/strong> reflection, including connections made to, personalization of, the theories, concepts, and\/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well-supported.<\/strong> Clear, detailed<\/strong> examples are provided, as applicable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Developed: <\/strong>Response is developed<\/strong> and generally<\/strong> demonstrates a reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and\/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate<\/strong> examples are provided, as applicable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Emerging: <\/strong>Response is emerging<\/strong> and demonstrates a partial reflection<\/strong> on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and\/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are partially unsupported or<\/strong> supported with flawed<\/strong> arguments. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant <\/strong>to the assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Initial: <\/strong>Response demonstrates an initial<\/strong> lack of<\/strong> reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and\/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate<\/strong>, and\/or unsupported<\/strong>. Examples, when applicable, are not provided.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Highly Developed: <\/strong>Response is highly developed,<\/strong> including all components, and exceeds<\/strong> all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each<\/strong> question or part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly.<\/strong> All<\/strong> attachments and\/or additional documents are included, as required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Developed: <\/strong>Response is developed,<\/strong> including all components,<\/strong> and meets the requirements indicated in the instructions. Each<\/strong> question or part of the assignment is addressed. All attachments<\/strong> and\/or additional documents are included, as required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Emerging:<\/strong> Response is emerging<\/strong> yet missing some<\/strong> components and only partially meets the requirements indicated in the instructions. Some<\/strong> question or part of the assignment is addressed. Some\/partial attachments<\/strong> and\/or additional documents, if required, are missing or unsuitable <\/strong>for the purpose of the assignment<\/p>\n\n\n\n Initial:<\/strong> Response demonstrates initial effort yet lacks components<\/strong> and\/or does not<\/strong> address the requirements indicated in the instructions. Many<\/strong> parts of the assignment are addressed minimally<\/strong>, inadequately, and\/or not at all.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Highly Developed:<\/strong> Writing is highly developed, clear, concise, and well organized, with excellent<\/strong> sentence\/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per submission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Developed:<\/strong> Writing is developed, clear, and well organized<\/strong> with excellent sentence\/paragraph construction. Thoughts are clearly<\/strong> expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than three<\/strong> spelling, grammar, or syntax errors, and the errors do not distract from contextual meaning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Emerging:<\/strong> Writing is emerging, partially clear,<\/strong> and well organized with excellent sentence\/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a partially coherent<\/strong> and logical manner. There are no more than 5<\/strong> spelling or syntax errors, and some errors distract from contextual meaning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Initial:<\/strong> Writing demonstrates initial skills but is lacking in clarity and is disorganized.<\/strong> Thoughts ramble and make little sense. There are numerous spelling<\/strong>, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response, distracting contextual meaning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Highly developed responses provide convincing evidence<\/strong> and demonstrate a depth of knowledge<\/strong> not found in a merely developed response. In a highly developed response, connections are explained<\/strong> and made to real-world situations and go beyond expectations<\/strong>, whereas a developed response makes only general connections <\/strong>that are not explained,<\/strong> and component requirements are met but not exceeded<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Where a developed response provides evidence<\/strong> that demonstrates an understanding of the content<\/strong> that meets the criteria, an emerging response provides only<\/strong> partial evidence,<\/strong> and the response may be unsupported, flawed, or missing elements<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While an emerging response provides partial evidence<\/strong> that demonstrates the required depth in all criteria of the assignment and may be unsupported, flawed,<\/strong> or missing elements, an initial response lacks the evidence required<\/strong> in all criteria of the assignment, and the evidence presented is minimal and inadequate<\/strong>, in addition to being unsupported or missing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A highly developed response provides an in-depth<\/strong> reflection where viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well-supported,<\/strong> and clear, detailed<\/strong> examples are provided. In a developed response, only a general<\/strong> reflection is demonstrated, and viewpoints and interpretations are merely supported<\/strong> with appropriate examples, as applicable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A highly developed response includes all components and exceeds all requirements<\/strong> indicated in the instructions. Each part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly, <\/strong>while a developed response merely meets the requirements<\/strong> indicated in the instructions and addresses each part of the assignment<\/strong>, if not quite so thoroughly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Structurally, the writing in a highly developed response is clear, concise, and well-organized, with excellent<\/strong> sentence\/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent<\/strong> and logical manner with no errors<\/strong> in spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per submission. The writing in a developed response is clear and well organized, <\/strong>if not concise, and there are no more than<\/strong> three<\/strong> spelling, grammar, or syntax errors, and the errors do not distract from contextual meaning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The response is highly developed and demonstrates an in-depth reflection, including connections made to, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and\/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well-supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n List each element you will need to address to earn the highly developed score:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The response is highly developed, including all components, and exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly. All attachments and\/or additional documents are included, as required.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n List each element you will need to address to earn the highly developed score:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Writing is highly developed, clear, concise, and well organized, with excellent sentence\/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than three spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n List each element you will need to address to earn the highly developed score:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The directions for Assignment 1B were to analyze the given Reflective Practice Rubric by unpacking the learning expectations by addressing specific questions. Unpacking the rubrics was to be used to assess our learning by clarifying the criteria and specific skills we are expected to acquire in all courses throughout the program. It will allow us […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":242,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"site-container-style":"default","site-container-layout":"default","site-sidebar-layout":"default","disable-article-header":"default","disable-site-header":"default","disable-site-footer":"default","disable-content-area-spacing":"default","footnotes":""},"categories":[756,6,754,681,644,755],"tags":[768,766,286,762,764,760,761,773,50,759,121,767,757,765,763,771,758,772,769,770],"class_list":["post-252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-academic-standards","category-coursework","category-educational-assessment","category-itl600-becoming-a-teacher","category-national-university","category-reflective-practice","tag-academic-excellence","tag-academic-language","tag-academic-performance","tag-assignment-assessment","tag-depth-of-reflection","tag-educational-achievement","tag-educational-criteria","tag-grading-criteria","tag-instructional-design","tag-learning-expectations","tag-learning-outcomes","tag-performance-levels","tag-reflective-practice-rubric","tag-rubric-analysis","tag-rubric-components","tag-rubric-unpacking","tag-self-assessment","tag-structural-writing","tag-student-evaluation","tag-teaching-and-learning"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=252"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":256,"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/252\/revisions\/256"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/242"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/passionateteachingjourney.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n\n\n\nComponents<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nStructural<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nDescribe the difference in level descriptors between highly developed and developed. What are the keywords and specific criteria that differentiate one level from the other?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nDescribe the difference in level descriptors between developed and emerging. What are the keywords and specific criteria that differentiate one level from the other?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nDescribe the difference in level descriptors between emerging and initial. What are the keywords and specific criteria that differentiate one level from the other?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nDescribe the criteria differences in the Depth of Reflection section, in the level descriptors, between highly developed and developed using the keywords and specific criteria that differentiate one level from the other?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nDescribe the criteria differences in the Components section, in the level descriptors, between highly developed and developed using the keywords and specific criteria that differentiate one level from the other?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nDescribe the criteria differences in the Structural section, in the level descriptors, between highly developed and developed using the keywords and specific criteria that differentiate one level from the other?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\nUnpack the highly developed criteria elements in the \u201cDepth of Reflection\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\nUnpack the highly developed criteria elements in the \u201cComponents\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n\n\n\nUnpack the highly developed criteria elements in the \u201cStructure\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n